But I will be able to map out all the same relations as were present in Cascade PLUS the additional ones I was missing, and I’ll be able to make more effective charts and overall reports…some of the Fancy UI that is specific to Cascade’s workflow will be missing, but the structure can mostly be the same, and hey, “you can’t have everything…where would you put it?”. no native task dependency feature), and there’s no direct Outlook connection with Fibery, there are sufficient workarounds that can be included in formulas or scripts to get by for now. And while Fibery isn’t perfect for task management yet (e.g. So many good things with Cascade, but at the end of the day, while it said it could also be used to manage projects and tasks, it really couldn’t do it sufficiently well enough to rely on it solely and thus would lead to inconsistencies between multiple platforms.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |